Listen to #Hashtag Hong Kong every Sunday morning at 8.15
Focussing on issues affecting civil society, we'll hear from representatives of NGOs, associations, statutory bodies, and non-profit groups.
(Sundays 8.15am - 8.25am)
As most will know, the law can be complicated, confusing and costly. In Hong Kong, 1.394 million people live at or below the poverty line and that population cannot afford to pay private lawyers’ fees.
We know from the Department of Justice’s 2008 consultancy study on the “Demand for and Supply of Legal and Related Services” that 79% of people in Hong Kong did not know what to do when faced with a legal problem and that 40% of respondents for that survey had a legal problem. Using these numbers, we estimate that the pool of disadvantaged people with a legal problem is 550,000, or thereabouts, and, of those, some 440,000 do not know where to go for help.
And so the fact is that, for HK’s poorest people, the most disadvantaged people, there is a legal access gap. The people we serve are underprivileged and are often also very vulnerable. Typical legal problems include things like family matters, employment and discrimination, education, housing, immigration, criminal matters and sometimes, personal injury, healthcare, probate and of course increasingly online scams.
They extraordinary people face significant disadvantages due to a confluence of factors: the complexity of the legal system, a lack of financial resources and education, cultural and gender access to justice barriers as well as an absence of legal and digital literacy. Language barriers can actually be a major barrier. Limited financial resources restrict people’s access to private legal representation. Lack of education and awareness about their rights further exacerbates the issue they face, making them vulnerable to exploitation and unfair treatment. There are also some systemic biases within the legal system can also disproportionately affect marginalised communities.
The government services and clinics may not always provide interpreters to non-Cantonese or non-English-speaking people, which can really complicate access to information, advice and/or representation. There are also Cultural stigmas around legal action, particularly in family or employment disputes, which can make individuals not seek help early enough, which means there is an over reliance on informal networks rather than the formal legal channels. And all these mean that even if the legal problem is settled for now, the outcome is not legally enforceable and it means thee can be even more problems further down the line. Overcoming these barriers requires comprehensive legal aid, community outreach, and also we would hope for some systemic reforms to ensure equal access to justice.
Hong Kong has limited publicly funded community legal information and advice centres. While the Department of Justice, the legal professional bodies, the Duty Lawyer Service and the Legal Aid Department provide some support, this does not cover all cases. In fact, it also only addresses cases once a person is able to identified and not everyone knows that the problem they have has a legal solution, let alone being able to name it and even to work out what to do about it.
Equal Justice fills this initial void by offering assistance in the early problem identification phases, helping with settlement to avoid stressful and costly court proceedings, linking disadvantaged people to lawyers and helping them throughout their case journey so they are supported, can understand what is going on and can navigate the system well enough to make informed decisions. And why? To ensure that they avoid any further hardship and specifically poverty.
We provide legal first aid - to disadvantaged people - who cannot afford or otherwise access the law and legal support. We empower people and communities with legal education, information, and support, to ensure that justice isn’t just a privilege for the wealthy and well-connected. We give free, face-to-face, tailored legal information and support, and and also refer cases to lawyers and counsellors. So far, we have worked on 3,000 cases, and we’re just 5 years old. Ad the people we help are 50% women, 30% children and 20% men.
When it comes to generalised legal support for Hong Kong’s disadvantaged population, organisations like Equal Justice and university clinics rely heavily on pro bono lawyers. But, demand often outstrips supply, especially for time-intensive cases like child abuse or neglect, intimate partner violence, discrimination and family disputes.
We have partnerships with 100+ amazing law firms and 54+ charities are robust but may not be able to scale given the widespread needs that we are already experienced. And our caseload has increased ~40% each year for the last 3 years, which is quite significant.
In March 2025, rather wonderfully, the HK Bar Association announced that they will be partnering with Equal Justice and 3 other NGOs more closely to bridge the community legal access gap. This is a very welcome endorsement.
Good morning. A movie titled "The Way We Talk" has brought people's attention to the needs of the local deaf community in Hong Kong. SLCO had begun supporting its production ten years ago. This is a first ever movie that has invited a large group of deaf people participating in the production, including its pre-production research, sign language training and supervision, and actors. It has reflected a wide range of genuine life experience of deaf people.
What makes "The Way We Talk" so touching to me is that the three main characters, despite their different upbringings, attitudes, choices, and pathways, come to respect and acceptance with each other, and become close friends. This concept of 'harmony in diversity' and inclusiveness is indeed rarely observed but invaluable in contemporary society.
However, throughout history, there have been many disputes and debates within the deaf community regarding sign language versus spoken language in education. These disagreements have led to significant divisions and even opposition among deaf people-It seems like a deaf person can either speak or sign.
I vividly remember a deaf student of mine who grew up with no sign language cried to me when he noticed that I was dedicated to re-introduce sign language learning in deaf education. Just like some parents and professionals, the student was strongly against sign language and believed that sign language learning would make deaf people dumb and consequently take away their opportunities to be ‘normal'. He attributed this as a betrayal of oral education that he wholeheartedly believed.
On the other hand, some deaf people using sign language feel that they were looked down upon by teachers when they were students because they could not speak well, while those who spoke well were always given a higher status in schools.
There is a long-standing misconception that no sign language learning should be given to deaf children with hearing aids or cochlear implants, but in fact, hearing instruments cannot bring normal hearing back to deaf people. Learning one more language, no matter if it is a sign or spoken language, can be a necessity or simply a personal choice for deaf people.The two languages are not mutually exclusive. It is their right to choose a language that suits them best, not to mention that sign language is the only language with no barriers to deaf people.
The scene in the movie that left the deepest impression on me is when Wolf suddenly realized that he would never been eligible to obtain a diving coach license just because he cannot hear. His emotional reaction was heartbreaking but also painfully real.
Speaking and hearing ability is just a small part of a person, yet society's biased view has neglected the potential of deaf people who rely on sign language and taken away their many opportunities to excel themselves. Suppressing this group of deaf people pushes them to the margins and leaves them isolated from society and even their families.
Self identity has always been a significant life challenge for many deaf people: Who am I? Am I deaf, hearing, or neither? Sadly,there have been deaf students of mine experienced severe emotional distress or even committed suicide because they were marginalized in the
society. They could not find their place in schools and families, to an extent that they continually rejected their own value and could not find reasons to love themselves.
Research tells us people with a bilingual bicultural identity possess a more positive self esteem since they do not have to force themselves to be a ‘normal' person or else a ‘person with disability’. The bilingual identity allows them to immerse themselves in both the deaf and hearing community and enjoy the friendships with both groups of persons with no restrictions. With this regard, the more sign bilingual talents we cultivate,the more communication bridges that are built to connect the deaf and hearing worlds.
20/04/2025 - Dr. Chris Yiu - Director of the SLCO Community Resources